Trump’s ai

The Trump Administration wants AI technology to be the leader of the field both at home and abroad. But it also does not want to give or encourage a foreign opponent to give or encourage the US AI.

It’s quite a balance to hit.

If President Trump AIwhich was released on Wednesday is any indicator, it seems that the administration has continued to clarify the correct approach to achieving these goals.

“America is currently a global leader in building a data center, calculating hardware performance and models,” the plan said. “It is imperative that the United States take advantage of this advantage of a global alliance sustainable, while preventing our opponent freely riding our innovations and investments.”

The plan mentions the strengthening of the export control of AI -Siru through “creative approaches”, followed by a couple of political recommendations.

The first government organizations, including the Department of the Ministry of Trade and the National Security Council, to work with the AI industry with the certification properties of the chip location. The second is a recommendation to get an attempt to investigate the implementation of potential chips; In particular, it mentions that while the United States and the allies set export controls on the large systems needed to make chips, many component component systems are not focused – a hint on where the administration wants DOC to direct its attention.

The AI action plan also speaks of how the United States must find a policy in this area with its global allies.

“America has to set a strong export control for sensitive technology,” the plan says. “We should encourage partners and allies to follow us control and not filling. If they do, America should use tools, such as foreign direct product rule and secondary tariffs, to achieve a larger international line.”

The AI ACT is never the details of how it reaches Al Global Alliances, coordinates with allies in export restrictions, or working with US AI companies in the certification properties of chip location. Instead, AI’s Action Plans include what fundamental building blocks are required for future sustainable sanctuary export instructions, unlike in addition to existing guidelines.

Result: Siru export restrictions take more time. And outside the AI action plan, there is a wealth of evidence to suggest it. For example, the Trump administration is at odds with several times in its export restriction strategy in recent months – including last week.

In July, the administration gave the semiconductor companies, such as Nvidia and AMD, to start the Green Light, which they had developed in China, only for months after the Licensing Restrictions were on the same AI chips that effectively pulled Nvidia from the Chinese market.

The administration also formally overturned the Biden Administration’s AI Diffusion Rule (which set the upper limit on how much AI was allowed to buy some AI data processing capacity in May, just days before it had to come into force.

The Trump administration is expected to sign several implementation regulations on July 23. Do these detailed plans include how it achieves its goals is unclear.

Although the AI action plan speaks for a long time about how to explore the US AI market worldwide, maintaining a dominant position, but it is light details. Unlike formal guidelines, all implementation regulations referred to in all chip export restrictions are likely to apply appropriate government departments together.